home pull down menu
 

BuRec Offers Title Transfer of Projects

Certain U.S. Bureau of Reclamation properties may be up for sale. The agency recently issued a document, "Framework for the Transfer of Title," outlining the process of transferring title of certain of its projects to interested bene ficiaries and non-federal governmental entities.
According to the document, BuRec's recent action is consistent with a policy the agency has had for decades; i.e., "to transfer operation and maintenance of projects to local entities where and when appropriate." Interest presently is growing for su ch transfers, reflecting current political thinking to limit the role of the federal government.
BuRec, however, is not proposing a wholesale sell-off of major federal properties. Instead the strategy, as described by a BuRec official, is to "pick the low-hanging fruit first." BuRec's framework document presents criteria determining which proj ects qualify as "low-hanging fruit" and describes the terms of proposed transfers.
For example, only "uncomplicated projects" will be considered for transfer. BuRec defines such projects as "projects or facilities where there are no competing interests, the facilities are not hydrologically integrated with other projects, the fina ncial arrangements are relatively simple and easily defined and the legal and institutional concerns associated with a transfer can be readily addressed."
These obviously are not terms for the marketing of Hoover Dam. The BuRec rules are more applicable to transferring far less complex projects; e.g, a small irrigation project in Wyoming that has operated for 70 or 80 years, and is still committed to its original purpose. Such a project would be limited in scope, not engaged in flood control, nor providing Indian or municipal water supplies, nor involved in any problems of endangered species within a watershed.
The framework lists six major criteria to be met prior to project transfer: the federal treasury must be protected; compliance with applicable state and federal laws must be ensured; interstate compacts and agreements must be protected; Native Americ an trust responsibilities must be met; treaty obligations and international agreements must be fulfilled; and the public aspects of the project must be protected.
BuRec and an interested party would determine the property's base value. A project's negotiated price, however, may vary from the base value due to "factual circumstances and equitable treatment consideration." In addition, when establishing a pric e, BuRec may consider future uses on the transferred lands and waters.
Further, the interested entity or buyer must pay appropriate costs for preparing the transfer. Such costs would vary depending upon the project, but could include paying to develop an environmental impact statement or for research to define the scop e, extent, and federal interest in the project.
After terms have been agreed upon, congressional approval is needed to finalize the transaction. Such approval is required because neither BuRec officials nor the Secretary of the Interior has the authority to dispose of federal property.
Varied opinions exist within BuRec regarding the value of the framework. "Some people in policy or in the political side believe the framework has a lot of merit," says Tom Burbey, BuRec Chief of Water Resources Management Division in Phoenix. He b elieves, however, that basic changes are needed before the policy will attract widespread interest.
BuRec officials surveyed Central Arizona water users to determine interest in the "framework" or other possible transfer terms. In general, respondents expressed interest in someday acquiring title to BuRec properties, but not now, nor under the pre sent terms, Burbey says. "People are interested in talking about it, but I don't think anyone is interested in jumping on the bandwagon and pursuing it."
Observers speculate about which Arizona entities might be interested in acquiring BuRec facilities. The Salt River Project is often mentioned as a possible interested party. But its interest is limited.
"We are not seeking nor do we want transfer of BuRec facilities," says SRP spokesperson John Egan. "As the various BuRec proposals are unveiled, we keep appraised of them to see how they would affect our operations and shareholders."
Central Arizona Water Conservation District has expressed interest in gaining title to the CAP headquarters complex, a BuRec facility. Discussions even have occurred about the value of the property. With CAWCD presently involved in a dispute with t he federal government, however, the district would be reluctant to approach Congress for approval to acquire title to CAP headquarters.
Several other efforts currently are underway for transferring BuRec facilities to nongovernment entities. California's Central Valley Project is developing a proposal to allow its members to purchase interest and title to federal facilities. Also, Senator Craig of Idaho has proposed HB 620, that arranges the transfer of federal properties to nonfederal interests.
BuRec took the initiative to develop its own procedure for transferring Bureau property, rather than wait for Congress or individual water users or projects to act. This strategy represents BuRec's contribution to reducing the national debt by cutti ng back its work force and budget. Further, by selling off its facilities, BuRec would be raising money to further offset the federal deficit.
 
 

Feature - Feature 2 - Announcements - Calendar of Events - News Briefs
Publications
- Transitions - Water Vapors - Legislation & Law


 

Water Center Home -- AWR Home -- Search