| |
Quick Reference to articles:
Tribal Irrigation Project Planned
Assured Water Supply Rules Take Effect
ADEQ Reorganizing -- Again
Pinal Authority Forgoes Revenue, Spares IMS
Tucson Narrows CAP Use Options
Fort Expansion Fuels River Debate
Mercury Found in Peña Blanca Fish
ADEQ Shuts Down Tombstone Waterline
Winter Was Warm, Wet
Tribal Irrigation Project Planned
- Following a public comment period that ends March 17, the Bureau of
Reclamation will prepare a draft programmatic environmental impact statement
(DPEIS) for construction of a common use irrigation system on the Gila
River Indian Community (GRIC). The system would serve lands identified
in the Tribe's Master Plan as areas of potential agricultural development.
This would include a maximum of 146,330 acres.
- CAP-authorized funds allowed under the Colorado River Basin Project
Act of 1968 (CRBPA) would fund the project. CRBPA authorized BuRec to
assist in development of water delivery systems for Indian communities
receiving CAP water. In 1992, GRIC formally contracted for 173,100 acre-feet
of CAP water and investigations concerning delivery of the water commenced.
- GRIC and BuRec determined that a common use irrigation system, capable
of conveying existing and future surface water and groundwater resources
in addition to CAP water, is likely to provide the maximum benefit.
Plans also provide for the enhancement of wildlife habitat and riparian
areas within GRIC, and for the rehabilitation and betterment of the
San Carlos Indian Irrigation Project Joint Works.
- The DPEIS, a general analysis of project alternatives, is expected
to be completed and available for public comment in August. The DPEIS
will be followed by development of more detailed design and construction
plans for specific GRIC sites.
- For more information concerning the DPEIS process contact Sandra
Eto, Environmental Protection Specialist, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O.
Box 9980, Phoenix, AZ 85058, 602-870-6771.
Assured Water Supply Rules Take Effect
- Arizona Department of Water Resources' "Assured and Adequate Water
Supply Rules" became effective February 7 (see June-July AWR, p.10).
Designed to limit groundwater depletion by new subdivisions in Active
Management Areas and promote Central Arizona Project water use, the
new rules require new developments in AMAs to demonstrate access to
an "assured water supply" (i.e., sufficient supply for 100 years). In
addition, the rules establish guidelines for determining adequate supplies
for new subdivisions outside of AMAs.
- Under the new rules, designated water providers have 180 days, or
until August 7, to apply for "Designation of Assured Water Supply."
Cities and towns with CAP allocations must file an application by December
31, 1997 to maintain their designation status. Applicants may qualify
for assured water supply through membership in the newly formed Central
Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD).
- ADWR has scheduled half-day workshops to explain the application
process and assist those intending to apply. Workshops are scheduled
for March 6, ADWR, third floor conference room, 500 N. Third St., Phoenix
and March 16, ADWR, Tucson AMA conference room, 400 W. Congress, Suite
518, Tucson. The concerns of water providers will be addressed from
9:00-11:30 a.m., with concerns of subdividers and local platting entities
discussed from 1:00-3:30 p.m. For information regarding CAGRD membership
contact the Central Arizona Water Conservation District at 602-870-2333.
ADEQ Reorganizing -- Again
- Discussions are underway at the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality on reorganizing the agency to better structure the operating
divisions along functional, rather than programmatic lines. This would
be the fourth reorganization of the Agency within the last four years.
- The move is geared towards increasing efficiency by replacing program-centric
units (e.g., mine permitting) with functionally defined units. One possibility
is creating four units within each of the three broad environmental
areas of water, air, and land. These would consist of: permitting; remediation;
compliance and enforcement; and support units. A more radical approach
would establish single permitting, remediation, and enforcement sections
for the entire agency.
Pinal Authority Forgoes Revenue, Spares IMS
- Pinal County Augmentation Authority's Board voted unanimously to forgo
$16,500 in pump tax revenues to avoid harming the Irrigation Management
Service (IMS). The popular water conservation program works intensively
with a small number of farmers each year to improve irrigation efficiencies.
- IMS has received $90,000 each of the last four years from Arizona
Department of Water Resources' conservation assistance grants. Revenues
for the grant program are generated by a 50¢ per acre-foot groundwater
pumping tax within the Pinal Active Management Area.
- Two events drastically reduced available grant funds for 1995: the
1993 statute that created the Pinal County Augmentation Authority allocated
half of all future pump tax revenues to the Authority; and subsidized
rates for Central Arizona Project water and other factors led to a 30
percent drop in both groundwater pumpage and tax revenues for 1994.
- IMS has secured its $90,000 budget for the current year by combining
a conservation assistance grant of $33,500 with $20,000 carried over
from previous years, $20,000 from the Bureau of Reclamation, and $16,500
in pump tax revenues the water authority agreed not to take. IMS is
seeking new funding sources for future years.
Tucson Narrows CAP Use Options
- The City of Tucson has narrowed the potential uses for its Central
Arizona Project (CAP) water from nine to five. Dropped from further
consideration are: rejecting CAP water and remaining solely on groundwater;
delivering CAP water to copper mines that currently pump groundwater;
exchanging Tucson's CAP water for Pinal County groundwater; and selling,
leasing, or recharging CAP water outside Arizona's Active Management
Areas. Each of these potential uses faced serious legal, economic and/or
hydrologic problems.
- Uses still being considered include: recharge of more CAP water through
injection wells, spreading basins, and in-stream; sale, lease and indirect
recharge of CAP water to local farmers; demineralization or other additional
treatment; and blending CAP water with high-quality groundwater from
the City's Avra Valley wellfield. The most controversial use still being
considered is treatment and direct delivery using Tucson's existing
water treatment plant. Direct delivery of CAP water in 1993 caused numerous
problems, including corrosion damage to the distribution system and
household appliances and plumbing fixtures.
- The five remaining use options will undergo further economic, legal,
and engineering analysis. It is anticipated that the final plan will
involve a combination of two to four of the most acceptable uses. With
a decision not likely for several months, Tucson Water is expanding
its pumping capacity to meet upcoming summer demand.
Fort Expansion Fuels River Debate
- Not long ago some Sierra Vista residents fretted that a controversy
over San Pedro River flow could result in the closure of Fort Huachuca,
the area's largest employer. About 13,000 military and civilian personnel
work at Fort Huachuca.
- That this was not an idle fear was confirmed by Secretary of the
Interior Bruce Babbitt last fall when he visited the area and dropped
a not-so-veiled hint that the fort could be closed down if longstanding
groundwater disputes are not resolved.
- Water disputes continue, however, and so does Fort Huachuca. In fact,
the fort not only survived the recent round of base closures, it actually
came out ahead. An additional 274 Army communications workers were assigned
to the fort.
- Some in Sierra Vista now have heightened hopes that Sierra Vista
will become a national center for military intelligence and communications.
Rep. Jim Kolbe wants other military-intelligence functions to be transferred
to Fort Huachuca, including the Army's Defense Language Institute in
Monterey, California.
- Some accuse the federal government of sending mixed messages. In
1988 Congress created the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area
to protect a 30-mile stretch of the river. Environmentalists are concerned
that groundwater pumping in the area eventually will affect the flow
of the San Pedro River, the largest undammed river in Arizona. The Southwest
Center for Biological Diversity has sued the Army claiming it has not
considered the effects of base expansion on decreasing water supplies.
Mercury Found in Peña Blanca Fish
- Fishermen are being advised not to eat most fish species caught at
Peña Blanca Lake after testing revealed mercury levels nearly three
times the safety standard set by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The advisory, issued jointly by the Arizona Departments of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) and Health Services, does not extend to other recreational
activities, or to trout, which are stocked in the 45-acre lake located
nine miles northwest of Nogales.
- ADEQ is investigating possible sources of the contamination, including
nearby abandoned mine tailings, agricultural fungicides, and natural
sources. Mercury is a toxic metal which accumulates in organisms and
can affect nerves, brain, and kidneys.
- The mercury advisory is the first one issued for an Arizona lake.
Testing at nearby Patagonia Lake revealed no traces of mercury.
ADEQ Shuts Down Tombstone Waterline
- The approximately 100 Sierra Vista area residents who have tapped
into Tombstone's waterline from the Huachuca Mountains may lose their
water supply due to a state order.
- The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ordered the antiquated
waterline shut down because the surface water supply is delivered to
homes without being filtered or chlorinated and may spread waterborne
contaminants. The city has until June 1 to comply with the order. Those
using the water are being notified of the pending action.
Winter Was Warm, Wet
- As an unusually warm and wet winter nears its end, the water supply
situation in the Colorado River basin appears mixed. In the upper basin,
southwestern Wyoming has below-average snowpack and poor reservoir storage.
Colorado also experienced sparse precipitation, except in the southwest
part of the state. Utah's precipitation was well above average, but
unseasonably warm temperatures melted snowpacks at lower elevations.
Snowpack in the San Juan River basin of New Mexico is somewhat above
normal, and streamflows in the San Francisco/Gila system are well above
normal.
- The suppy outlook is more positive in the lower basin. Nevada had
a wet winter, and California officially ended its drought, as flooding
replaced shortage as the principle water problem. Arizona's snowpack,
precipitation and reservoir storage all look very good.
|
|
|