Water Resources Legislation: 1999 Legislative Summary
Water management-related legislation passed by the 44th Arizona
Legislature is summarized below. The general effective date of the following
legislation is August 6, 1999. (The summary was prepared by the Arizona
Department of Water Resources.) HB 2463 Water Banking Amendments As
part of the legislation that created the Arizona Water Banking Authority
(AWBA), the Arizona Water Banking Study Commission was created to evaluate the
effectiveness of AWBA's powers and duties and make appropriate recommendations
to the Legislature. HB 2463 was the result of the Study Commission's
recommendation and includes the following provisions: 1) Authorizes AWBA to
enter into agreements with Arizona water users to provide water storage
services and to administer the storage accounting thereby assisting water users
to earn water storage credits; 2) Provides the AWBA the authority to loan
long-term storage credits to Arizona water users for short-term use with
appropriate compensation to the AWBA; 3) Allows the AWBA to earn long-term
storage credits by obtaining and storing effluent if the AWBA has stored the
available excess CAP water and if CAP water is not otherwise available; and 4)
Expands the ability of the AWBA to provide drought prot ection for water
providers that do not generally provide CAP to their customers. HB
2262 CAGRD; Assured Water Supply allows a city, town or private water
company that qualifies as a member service area of the Central Arizona
Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD) to meet the physically available
water supply standard of the assured water supply rules by entering into a
contract with the CAGRD to store water in the area where the water will be
recovered from or to receive water through direct delivery from the CAGRD.
First however CAGRD must submit a water availability status plan for approval
by the Arizona Department of Water Resources. Following the initial submittal
of a plan, CAGRD must submit subsequent plans every five years as part of its
submittal of long-range plans describing the activities the CAGRD proposes to
undertake to fulfill their replenishment obligations. The amount of water that
may be served pursuant to these agreements is limited to no more than 20,000
acre-feet per year. HB 2144 Drainage Water Withdrawal Permits
allows water withdrawn pursuant to a drainage water withdrawal permit in
designated waterlogged areas to be used or conveyed for a nonirrigation use
within the designated waterlogged area. Use of the water withdrawn pursuant to
a drainage water withdrawal permit is to be accounted for as surface water when
determining compliance with water conservation requirements during the second
and third management periods. The water must be used in a riparian habitat or
at a turf-related facility such as a golf course, park or school served by a
nonirrigation grandfathered right or a general industrial use permit. Rather
than be levied a groundwater withdrawal fee, a user who withdraws groundwater
pursuant to a drainage water withdrawal permit must pay a $500 annual fee to be
deposited into the Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund. HB 2189
Environment; Corrections As part of a comprehensive legislative effort to
address Department of Environmental Quality issues two provisions addressed
matters important to water quantity management. The first applied to language
in Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund statutes that extends to the second
management plan a provision that ADWR must account for groundwater withdrawn
pursuant to a groundwater quality remediation in the same way as it accounts
for surface water in determining compliance with third, fourth and fifth
management plan conservation requirements. The second amendment clarifies that
groundwater withdrawn from wells drilled to replace wells closed as a result of
contamination addressed in a remedial action does not qualify for the
conservation accounting break, nor does the groundwater qualify for an
exemption from assured water supply accounting provisions. SB 1150
Generating Plants; Air, Water Study was passed to address issues regarding
the use of groundwater in a gas-fired power plant proposed to be located near
Kingman, Arizona. This bill creates a joint legislative study committee on gas
fired electrical generating plants that is directed to evaluate the effects on
the aquifers and other water sources that result from the use of groundwater
and surface water by such plants. The bill also directs the committee to look
at air quality, revenue, taxation and economic development issues.
SB 1173 CAWCD Board; Population Basis (Laws 1999, Chapter 58) addresses
the potential concern that in the 2000 census Pima County population will
exceed 700,000, thereby entitling Pima County to increase its representation on
the Central Arizona Water Conservation District Board from 4 to 10 directors.
Representation on the board would then be equal to that of Maricopa County,
when the population of Pima County is approximately one-third that of Maricopa
County. This legislation maintains a 15 member board, with one seat to Pinal
County, four to Pima County and ten to Maricopa County. To address proportional
representation requirements, a system of proportional weighting of board votes
is established based on the distribution of the population of each county.
General Appropriations bill for fiscal years 2000 and 2001
addressed two issues pertaining to ADWR. The first created a $1.2 million rural
water studies appropriation for FY2000 to be used to provide state
contributions to water management studies conducted in eight areas of the
state. In addition, the Arizona Water Protection Fund received no
appropriation, and was directed instead to use currently unencumbered funds to
finance its activities for the 2000 and 2001 fiscal years. |