| |

Quick Reference to articles:
Conference Celebrates Sonoran Desert Cultures
Ak-Chin Water Leased for Development
MDWID Survey Reveals Groundwater Preferred
Uranium Tailings May Threaten the Colorado
Municipal Conservation Efforts Redirected
Tucson Water Plans for Possible Shortage
Water Protection Priorities Noted
Conference Celebrates Sonoran Desert Cultures
Along with celebrating the arts and crafts, foods, dance and music of the
Sonoran Desert, the March 2-5 international conference, "A Celebration of
Desert Cultures" at Caborca, Sonora discussed the history, pre-history,
archeology, and ethnobotany of the region. Water-related issues were prevalent
among the presentations.
- A day-long session discussed traditional agricultural methods, ethnobotany,
and water use. A speaker described agriculture in a region of the Pinacates
in Sonora, where crops are successfully raised without supplemental
irrigation on less than 4 inches of rainfall per year. Other farms in
the same region were unable to irrigate successfully because of the
high cost of irrigation systems. Traditional successful farming practices
(including dryland farming as well as irrigation) of the Pima Indians
also were discussed.
- An in-progress study was described looking at the history of human
impacts on Arizona rivers. The impacts include such activities as groundwater
pumping, diversions, dams, introduction of exotic plant species, urban
development and livestock grazing.
- This was the third annual conference of the International Sonoran
Desert Alliance, an offshoot of the Sonoran Institute in Tucson. The
Water Resources Research Center co-sponsored the event. To be included
on the mailing list for next year's conference, contact the Sonoran
Institute, 520-290-0828.
Ak-Chin Water Leased for Development
Water needed for a proposed Del Webb development at New River could
come from the Ak-Chin Indian Community. Del Webb has purchased an option
to lease up to 10,000 acre-feet of water a year from the community for
100 years.
- The U.S. Department of Interior has approved the lease, and it is
an enforceable, binding contract, said Bill Swan, agency field solicitor.
The Ak-Chin would be leasing water received in its 1983 settlement.
The tribe was granted about 75,000 acre-feet, including CAP water and
water from a Colorado River entitlement.
- Although tribes previously have leased water for off-reservation
uses, the Ak-Chin agreement represents the first time Indian water would
be leased off-reservation for a development. The original Ak-Chin water
settlement did not provide for off-reservation leasing. Congress, however,
amended the settlement in 1982 granting the tribe this right.
- Critics doubt the Ak-Chins have the water to spare. The tribe has
the right to 75,000 acre-feet a year, with an extra 10,000 acre-feet
during years when extra water is available. The tribe would get 72,000
acre-feet during years of shortages. Last year the Ak-Chin used 70,000
acre-feet.
- Critics also question whether the water supply is sufficient for
the size of the proposed community. The Maricopa County supervisors
are scheduled to vote next month on the controversial Del Webb proposal
to build 16,500 houses and three golf courses on an 8.8 square mile
tract that would eventually attract a population about equal to that
of Flagstaff. The New River property is located about 12 miles north
of the urban edge of Phoenix and 33 miles from downtown.
MDWID Survey Reveals Groundwater Preferred
A poll of Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District customers
revealed a strong desire to continue receiving groundwater rather than
treated Central Arizona Project water, and a willingness to pay significantly
higher water bills to make it happen. The survey of all MDWID customers
revealed that residents of the northwest Tucson metropolitan area generally
approve of the quality of their tap water, and are unwilling to accept
treated CAP water from Tucson. By a wide margin, they expressed a preference
to have the utility recharge CAP water instead.
Uranium Tailings May Threaten the Colorado
Some 10.5 million tons of radioactive dirt lie exposed in southeastern
Utah, three miles north of Moab, the legacy of a uranium mill that operated
there during the 1950s. Groundwater in the area is contaminated with
up to 1,000 times the allowable federal standard, and the question remains
whether any of the contamination has reached the Colorado River. Although
the potential threat of the dump is readily recognized, answers to the
question vary.
- Richard Blubaugh of the Atlas Corp. cites several reasons why he
believes contamination has not reached the river. He says the arid conditions
of the region and the small size of the aquifer have prevented transport
of the contamination to the Colorado River.
- Others, including officials from Utah and surrounding states, are
not so sure. Some fear that contamination has in fact reached the river,
and a national park official says river sampling has demonstrated that
some leaching has occurred. Little or no sediment sampling has been
done.
- To confront the problem, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Committee originally
intended to simply place a cap on the dump. In response to concerns
raised by Utah officials, NRC instead decided to write an environmental
impact statement. Along with in-place capping, the EIS also will examine
the much more expensive option of hauling the waste to a safer disposal
area.
- Downstream from Moab the Colorado River flows through or around five
national parks and provides drinking water for milloins of residents
of the Southwest, including those in metropolitan Las Vegas, Los Angeles,
and Phoenix.
Municipal Conservation Efforts Redirected
Many municipal water conservation programs in Maricopa and Pima counties
are undergoing changes in program direction. Some have been reduced
in scope, while others have increased responsibilities. Many are experiencing
budget and staff increases, as they attempt to reach out to new groups
of water users; a few are being given significantly fewer resources.
- Overall, programs aimed at existing residential and indoor water
uses are being reduced. Instead, greater emphasis is being put on conservation
programs that target multi-family and non-residential water uses. Last
year's upsurge in new home construction has caused Glendale, Scottsdale,
Phoenix, and Peoria to provide new home buyers with more information
on xeriscapes before they buy a home and the yard is planted with turf
by default. In addition, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Tempe are developing
xeriscape demonstration gardens.
- Raising the visibility of conservation is another priority, with
greater emphasis on videos, public service announcements, and school
programs. Mesa found an innovative and inexpensive way to spread the
conservation message, by printing it on Pogs.
- These changes reflect the maturation of conservation programs, which
generally begin by focussing on existing residential water uses, and
rely heavily on audits and distribution of leak detection kits and low-flow
devices. Programs targeting multi-family units and residential landscaping
often follow. Eventually, the focus widens, as conservation managers
grapple with the more varied commercial and industrial uses of water,
and attempt to learn what assistance these customers need to reduce
water consumption. An example is AMWUA's current efforts to develop
a facility managers' guidebook.
- Many programs, including those in Tempe, Chandler and Mesa, have
increased staff and funding, although in the case of Mesa, responsibilities
also have been expanded to include natural gas conservation efforts.
Scottsdale's budget is not significantly changed.
- Programs with reduced staff or budgets include Phoenix, Tucson, and
the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association (AMWUA). After flat budgets
over the last three years, AMWUA's conservation budget is being trimmed
by about 12 percent. Phoenix's conservation program experienced multiple
cuts over the last four years, but this year, there will be relatively
modest program reductions in some areas and modest increases in multi-family
and non-residential programs. The reduced conservation budget mostly
reflects the transfer of staff responsible for rate setting from the
water department to the city's finance department.
- Large cuts are being experienced by the state's oldest conservation
program, Tucson's. Both staff and budget have been reduced by over a
third, with some popular programs eliminated (see following story).
Tucson Water Plans for Possible Shortage
An emergency ordinance authorizing a temporarily prohibition of landscape
irrigation and other water uses has been approved by the Tucson City
Council. Tucson Water officials requested the authority due to the threat
of supply shortages this summer.
- Tucson's Central Arizona Project treatment plant currently is shut
down while consultants consider alternative uses of CAP water. A key
pipeline that imports 20 percent of the utility's supply from neighboring
Avra Valley recently underwent emergency repairs after the discovery
of corroded joints, but the possibility of a rupture remains. Limits
on pumping from wells located near riparian areas also are constraining
the supply.
- The move follows major cuts in Tucson's conservation program and
elimination of its popular low-flow toilet rebate program. The city
also ended summer surcharge water rates. Rates last were raised three
years ago.
Water Protection Priorities Noted
As part of its task of completing a draft application manual, the Water
Protection Fund Commission (WPFC), which administers the Arizona Water
Protection Fund grants program, sent out approximately 900 questionnaires
in March to individuals, groups, and agencies. Input was requested on
which areas in Arizona to target for protection and restoration projects,
issues of concern, and appropriate measures for addressing these issues.
Facilitated workshops also were conducted.
- The WPFC received 82 responses to the questionnaires, a response
rate of 11 percent. The San Pedro, Santa Cruz, Verde, and Gila surface
water basins were most often noted as needing protection. Priority issues
of concern included groundwater pumping/overdraft, grazing, development,
and agriculture.
- Respondents further indicated that grazing controls, recharge, revegetation,
public education and water conservation projects would be effective
in alleviating negative impacts in riparian areas.
- The questionnaire and workshop responses, along with other project
criteria such as need for the project, feasibility, cost-effectiveness,
broad-based local involvement, matching fund availability, habitat impacts,
and monitoring capability, have been incorporated into the application
criteria rating system.
- An informal public hearing on the draft criteria rating system will
be held April 25, at the Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix.
Also, written comments may be submitted to the WPFC from mid-April,
when the draft application manual will be available, through mid-May.
Application packets will be available from ADWR starting June 1.
- For information regarding the upcoming hearing or WPFC activities,
contact Tricia McCraw, Arizona Department of Water Resources, 602-417-2460.
|
|
|