| |

Quick Reference to articles:
Salt, Verde Water Supplies Recovering
Safe Drinking Water Act Amended
EPA Targets Rural Wastewater Needs
Western Water Quality Standards Studied
USGS-Weather Service Joint Use Building Dedicated
The year 1996 was very dry in Arizona. Precipitation
for October 1995 through February 1996 was 50 percent of normal for
the Salt and Verde watersheds, and snowpack reached only 75 percent
of normal by March 1, 1996 (see chart below). This year, precipitation
for October 1996 through February 1997 was 83 percent of normal, and
snowpack was 100 percent of normal on March 1. Reservoir levels have
not recovered, however. Supplies declined from 63 percent of capacity
on March 1, 1996 to 47 percent on March 1 1997.

The Safe Drinking Water Act was amended in
August 1996 for the second time since its establishment in 1974. Among
the changes is a prioritization of contaminant regulation according
to health risks, greater attention to the needs of small water providers,
and better availability of water quality information to consumers.
Changes in the contaminant selection criteria are to make risk assessment
and prioritization part of the selection process. Selection will be
based partially on whether there is a meaningful opportunity for reduction
in risk from adverse health effects for persons served by the system.
And, instead of regulating an additional 25 contaminants every three
years as per the 1986 amendments, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will publish a list of contaminants and then decide whether
or not to regulate at least five of them every five years.
EPA is to decide at the time a standard is proposed whether its benefits
justify its costs. EPA will continue to establish standards based on
affordable technology available, but MCL's may subsequently be adjusted
to "maximize health risk reduction benefits at a cost that is justified
by the benefits." However, EPA can bypass the requirements of the
contaminant selection process and the cost/benefit justification if
a contaminant is determined to pose an urgent threat to public health.
The amendments require states to protect drinking water sources by identifying
potential contaminants in source watersheds and assessing the susceptibility
of the state's water systems to those contaminants. States also are
required to establish the legal authority to ensure that new water systems
can meet drinking water standards, as well as identify existing water
systems needing assistance. And states must implement an operator certification
program to ensure that every system has an operator to perform key compliance
functions.
The amendments also create state Drinking Water Revolving Funds to assist
water providers in meeting the requirements of the Act. Specific funding
objectives include source water protection, loans to small and/or disadvantaged
water providers, and research on the health effects of contaminants.
The funds may be distributed as set-asides or loans. Each state must
set aside at least 15 percent of the fund for small water providers.
A $50 million U.S. Environmental Protection
grant program will help rural, disadvantaged communities with fewer
than 3,000 residents meet wastewater treatment needs. Guidelines and
funding allotments for the Hardship Grants Program for Rural Communities
were released March 20.
Targeting small, rural communities with outdated or failing wastewater
treatment systems, the program will be implemented in conjunction with
the Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan program (see previous story).
EPA funds states, which in turn provide hardship assistance to communities.
For guidelines or further information, call Stephanie von Feck, 202-260-2268
or visit EPA's web site at: http://www.epa.gov/owm/wm042002.htm.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
the U.S. Congress funded Pima County Wastewater Management Department
to undertake a water quality study. Titled the "Arid West Water
Quality Research Project," the project will have significant implications
for water quality regulations and treatment in the arid and semi-arid
West. Funds from the $5-million grant will sponsor research to develop
appropriate water quality criteria for arid regions. The research is
to produce water quality criteria to protect species and habitat from
ephemeral and effluent-dependent ecosystems.
The project has a regional focus involving wastewater agencies, local
governments, tribal interests, state and federal regulators, universities
and environmental groups. It is an opportunity for western water and
wastewater agencies, working in conjunction with EPA Region IX and others
throughout the arid West, to build a scientific basis for appropriate
water quality standards for the western ecosystems. (See Announcements,
p. 10 for information about a related water quality conference.)
For additional project information contact Pima County Wastewater Management,
201 N. Stone Ave., Tucson, AZ 85701; phone 520-740-6500; fax 520-620-0135.
Dignitaries and scientists gathered at the
University of Arizona on March 21 to dedicate the new Environmental
and Natural Resources Building. Envisioned as the first of a three-phase
complex, the facility houses the National Weather Service and the U.S.
Geological Survey's Water Resources Division, which includes hydrology,
GIS, NAWQA, and Glen Canyon Environmental activities.
Locating federal agencies on campuses of research universities is a
growing trend. This is the first time, however, that a facility houses
both the Survey and the Weather Service. Benefits of the shared facility
are expected to include cost savings, greater cooperation between the
USGS, NWS and faculty, and enhanced opportunities for students.
|
|
|