|
||
![]()
ASU's Decision Theater Offers Varied Views on Policy Issues Facility is high-tech tool useful for envisioning water policy options Considering its function Arizona State University's Decision Theater is aptly named since it demonstrates that in ancient Greek the words theater and theory derived from a common root. The Greek ancestor of the word theater is thetron, a place for seeing; Greek theri is the root of theory and means among other things contemplation and speculation.Far removed from the Classical World, Decision Theater utilizes an advanced visualization technique that provides a special way to see and contemplate public policy and other issues. Decision Theater has been likened to an IMAX! cinema. Its core component, called the Drum, is a 260-degree, faceted screen with seven rear projection passive stereo sources displaying panoramic computer graphics or 3D screen video content. Up to 25 people can participate, interacting with each other and the on-screen scenario.
The Decision Theater, also called a policy visualization center, is a resource
that enables public officials, entrepreneurs, business leaders and other
decision makers to "see," in three-dimensional detail, the outcomes
of decisions they might make about various issues. Complex issues are visualized
through computer modeling and simulation, and the virtual reality enables
viewers to contemplate policy implications and make more informed decisions.
Decision Theater Research Scientist Jessica Block emphasizes another
aspect of the operation in its goal to link researchers at the university
with community members and their needs. She says this was especially evident
in the work they did with the East Valley Water Forum. More specifically EVWF was concerned about managing its groundwater
resources. That aquifers were common to many users necessitated a regional
approach to planning, especially since EVWF member communities bordered
Phoenix, a rapidly growing urban center. Decision Theater assisted the
forum by creating 3D models showing the long-term impact of development
on the aquifer. A geopolitical decisions making process was developed
incorporating visual modeling and simulation activities. She says, "We were able to generate surfaces out of data and animate them through time. The entire group was then able to discuss where groundwater overdraft should be mitigated and how population growth was going to affect the aquifer. They got the gist of it more quickly, and within 10 minutes everyone was on the same page and the discussion could move forward." Also participants were able to employ interactive strategies to simulate/evaluate the effects of potential water management policies on water supply. This viewing of simulations and models provided a basis for group discussions. The resulting analysis assisted the East Valley Water Forum in efforts to develop guidelines and policies to manage both groundwater and surface water in the future. Another water protect utilizing Decision Theater is being conducted by Dr. Mark Schmeeckle and his graduate student, Ryosuke Akahori. They are studying the interaction between turbulence structures and suspended sediment in rivers to determine how to prevent sandbars in the Colorado River from washing away. They are working with the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center. Decision Theater also benefits ASU researchers by enabling them to compose
visualization representations of their projects or work. Attractive, informational
representations are invaluable in clarifying ideas and concepts for presentations,
whether in a research proposals or when explaining research results. Also,
audience reception to complex and detailed information is likely to be
greater with the use of visualization.
|
||
|
Image - Feature 1 - Water Vapors - News Briefs - Announcements - Guest View - Legislation & Law - Publications - Public Policy Review |
||
|
Water Center Home -- AWR Home -- Search |
||