| |

Past, Present AZ Town Halls Raise Water Issues Needing
Attention
By Sharon Megdal
 |
In 1997, I attended my first Arizona Town Hall.
The topic was water. This fall, I had the privilege of attending the 85th
Town Hall, entitled Arizonas Water Future: Challenges and
Opportunities, in a dual role. Because I served as one of the authors
of the background research report, I served as a resource consultant to
one of the panels. But I also was a participant involved in the panels
discussions and deliberations. This was the largest Town Hall ever. Almost
180 people participated. It was a stimulating few days!
To me, there were some marked differences between the atmosphere of this
most recent Town Hall and the one several years ago. Seven years ago,
a major concern was the formation of new Active Management Areas. I recall
the strength of the opposition to the concept of extending state regulation
of groundwater beyond existing AMA boundaries. The 1997 Town Hall was
very clear on this. The Report concluded that the AMA model is not
the appropriate mechanism for local problem-solving and development of
long-term water planning. The recent Town Hall accepted this conclusion
as a given. The focus this time was more on how to meet the informational
and financial needs of local and regional efforts to develop and implement
water resource plans.
In 1997, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality was beset by
difficulties and its viability as a state water agency was questioned.
The report recommended consideration be given to merging some of
ADEQs water quality programs into ADWR to ensure continuity in water
management. ... One agency should be responsible for coordinating and
managing water quantity and quality. Now on firmer ground, ADEQ
wasnt focused on this year.
Instead, the importance of providing resources to enable the Arizona Department
of Water Resources to carry out a much-expanded mission was the focus
of much discussion. The importance of this issue can be gauged from a
motion unanimously adopted during the plenary session: The primary
recommendation from this Town Hall is that dedicated and secure funding
sources be created to finance Arizonas critical water management,
planning and infrastructure needs. Without such secure funding, the other
recommendations of this report are not achievable.
Other recommendations included that ADWR be responsible for collecting
and disseminating information about water supplies and demand, particularly
in non-AMA areas. It was also concluded that ADWR should be responsible
for coordinating long-range, statewide water planning. The report stated:
ADWR must play a central leadership and advocacy role. The Agencys
statewide mission should be expanded and strengthened in the areas of
policy development, planning and data collection. ADWRs strategic
plan should be implemented by local policymakers on a regional basis.
Town Hall recommends that a primary objective in any planning process
is for ADWR to collect comprehensive hydrologic data on all Arizona water
resources, including water quality in conjunction with ADEQ, and disseminate
such information throughout the state. It also should lead in the statewide
conservation campaign.
Town Halls front-and-center attention to ADWR is appropriate. The
state agency would be responsible for carrying out many of the recommendations,
if implemented. Fulfilling these new functions would require considerable
financial resources and talent, and the agency already is in financial
straits, unable perform its current mission. The Town Hall recommended
that ADWR receive additional resources to help it meet the challenge of
assisting in the resolution of Arizonas current and future water
challenges.
In addition to increased general fund appropriations, it was recommended
that costs caused by growth should be funded by growth and
new funding mechanisms be explored. The funding mechanisms specifically
mentioned included bonding (which is really a method of financing), exempt
well fees, federal programs such as Water 2025, surcharges, permit and
impact fees, private sector donations coupled with tax credits or deductions,
property taxes, and user taxes. This is quite an inclusive list, but perhaps
the most important part of the primary recommendation is the inclusion
of the word secure. This acknowledges that it would not do
much good if increased revenues generated by new funding sources were
used to replace existing general fund revenues.
The serious drought conditions and their implications were covered in
the Town Hall background report and reflected in the report adopted at
the closing plenary session. Although continuing to grow at a rapid pace,
many of the states communities have not quantified the water resources
needed for expected growth. Town Hall participants questioned whether
the general public understands the critical nature of Arizonas water
issues. The Report stated, In the short term, all Arizonans must
be educated about the severity of the [drought] issue, supply limitations
and potential solutions. The Town Hall called for increased water
literacy.
The importance of education at all levels was highlighted, with the report
emphasizing development of a conservation ethic and recommending that
Arizona take a national leadership role in developing and implementing
a new K-12 conservation curriculum that is aligned to the state educational
standards. We at the Water Resources Research Center already are
assuming a leadership role. Arizona Project WET, as well as other programs
and individuals, have been working on aligning water resource curricula
with state standards. We can attest to strong community and water company
support for conservation and general water stewardship curricula. Additional
resources will enable us to train teachers to integrate water into their
instruction and generate the financial resources to support delivery of
water education to all Arizona schools.
This was the fifth Arizona Town Hall to address water issues. Lets
see if we can resolve some of these critical water issues prior to the
sixth. We have our work cut out for us!

|
|