| |
Bioremediation — Water Treatment Tool to Fix Pollution Problems
by Joe Gelt
Bioremediation is putting microorganisms to work.
“Bio” refers to the biological organisms and “remediation”
refers to the job to be done: remediating or resolving an environmental
problem caused by toxic chemicals and other hazardous wastes in soil and
groundwater.
| UA, ASU Bioremediation Projects Bioremediation
work at the University of Arizona includes two projects using elemental
sulphur to feed naturally occurring microorganisms that will then
degrade pollutants. One of the projects is to remove nitrate from
contaminated groundwater. This is a concern in Arizona since about
7 percent of Arizona’s groundwater wells exceed the primary
maximum concentration level for nitrate. A challenge in developing
the project was supplying the naturally occurring microbes with
the appropriate food to begin the process of denitrification which
converts nitrate to harmless dinitrogen gas.
The conventional approach is to feed the microbes organic food such
as acetate, the main constituent in vinegar, or simple alcohols.
Using these energy sources, however, has limitations. Along with
the high cost, organic residuals and biofouling could result. The
project is taking a different approach by investigating the use
of elemental sulfur as an inexpensive inorganic food source for
the denitrifying microorganisms.
UA’s Water Resources Research Center awarded the project Section
104B funds from the Water Resources Research Act, funded by the
U.S. Geological Survey.
The UA researchers are using the same technique to treat water contaminated
with perchlorate. This is a groundbreaking approach since elemental
sulphur has not been used before in a bioremediation process to
degrade perchlorate. Hydro Geo Chem, the corporate sponsor of the
above two projects, has applied for a pattern for this process.
The UA principal investigators are Reyes Sierra-Alvarez and Jim
Field, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering. Hydro
Geo Chem principal investigators are Harold and Richard Bentley.
Researchers at Arizona State University’s Biodesign Center
also are studying ways to use bioremediation for treating contaminated
water. Rather than sulphur, they are using hydrogen to energize
the microbes to remove contaminants from the water. Delivering the
hydrogen to the microbes safely and effectively, however, was a
problem to work out.
Bruce Rittmann, Director of the Center for Environmental Biotechnology
at the Biodesign Institute, addressed the problem by using a membrane
biofilm reactor to transfer hydrogen directly to microbes. The microbes
then go to work, converting nitrate into nitrogen gas, perchlorate
into chloride ions, and other contaminants into harmless forms.
|
Biodegradation is a natural process. In a non-polluted environment microorganisms
or microbes, including bacteria, algae and fungi, are hard at work breaking
down organic matter. Enter an organic pollutant such as gasoline or oil.
The result: some of the microbes die while others capable of eating the
organic pollutant survive.
Bioremediation speeds the process and increases efficiency by providing
pollution-eating organisms with fertilizer, oxygen, and other conditions
that encourage their rapid growth. The feeding of the microbes, sometimes
whimsically called “bugs,” causes more chemicals to be digested
and converted into water and harmless gases such as carbon dioxide. The
field of bioremediation encompasses numerous strategies to clean up pollution
by enhancing the same biodegradation processes that occur in nature.
In exceptional cases, specialized, non-indigenous microbes might be introduced
to help degrade the contaminants. This, however, is rarely done as University
of Arizona microbiologist Jim Field explains, “That is a misnomer
about bioremediation that we use super bugs from the lab, but that is
not true. ... Most of the time in bioremediation we provide the conditions
that are optimal for degradation rather than providing the microorganisms.”
Establishing a bioremediation system is a complicated task requiring an
interdisciplinary approach. Hydro Geo Chem’s Principal Scientist
Harold Bentley explains: “It requires knowledge of chemistry, biology,
and hydrology and the flow system, all of those things integrated together.
It requires a significant understanding of the site and the ability to
use knowledge gained about the site to tune your system.”
Bentley says, “There usually is a biological solution to most pollution
problems. ... It is finding the right microbe to work against a particular
pollutant, with something added to encourage the reaction.”
Essential to establishing a bioremediation system is a knowledge and understanding
of microbes and their pollution-fighting potential. Northern Arizona University’s
Bioremediation Initiative or BIORIN is a resource in this area. To promote
a better understanding for the potential of bioremediation and to encourage
its greater use, BIORIN researchers are identifying microbial processes
that actively biodegrade contaminants.
Such basic information is very much needed. Maribeth Watwood, chair of
NAU’s Department of Biological Sciences, says, “When you want
to consider bioremediation as a remediation option at a site, EPA and
other agencies require that the best available technology be used. Without
having a strong literature base, it is very difficult, no matter how great
the idea is, to claim it is the best demonstrated technology.”
BIORIN is compiling a database to provide credible documentation work
in support of considering bioremediation at contaminated sites with certain
characteristics. Bruce Hungate and Egbert Schwartz, both NAU professors,
work with Watwood on the BIORIN team. Watwood says, “There is a
big push to understand biodegradation processes; we know astonishingly
little about the range of capabilities of bacteria. Subsurface microbiology
is a new field, relative to other branches of environmental science.”
Field also acknowledges the need for much more research. He says, “Of
all the microbes that we know exist based on DNA we have only been able
to culture about one or two percent of them.” Microbes are best
studied by culturing.
BIORIN was also established to promote bioremediation in Arizona by providing
information about the technique and demonstrating their efficacy. Watwood
says Arizona has lagged somewhat in adopting bioremediation technology.
“ADEQ is receptive, but they need to see data, to see this actually
works before implementing it full-scale.” She hopes that such work
as is being done at an Arizona Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund
site in Tucson will demonstrate the effectiveness of the biological approaches.
Along with University of Arizona researcher Mark Brusseau, BIORIN researchers
are studying the Tucson WQARF site located near Park and Euclid avenues.
The site was once the location of railroad yard and dry cleaning operations.
Work at the site includes determining what kinds of microbes are in the
subsurface, including those within the contaminated plume. Further, tests
are being conducted to determine not only what kinds of contaminants the
bugs can degrade but whether they are in fact doing it. The researchers
are using techniques developed at BIORIN to obtain the information.
Techniques being applied to the site include molecular procedures that
identify specific microbes, and enzyme probes and stable isotope approaches
that identify specific degradation reactions taking place in the contaminated
zone.
Watwood says BIORIN has been able to demonstrate the occurrence of plentiful
natural microbial activity that is degrading some of the main contaminants
at the site. This will be an important factor to consider when designing
a cleanup strategy.
Bioremediation has wide and varied application. Watwood says, “There
is very likely a biological approach that can be the solution or part
of the solution for many different contaminated sites. In cases where
it is very difficult to stimulate the natural community we look to more
heavily engineered systems, possibly relying on the activity of added
organisms or systems using genetically modified organisms”
She notes, however, that genetic engineering raises other kinds of problems.
Strict federal regulations have to be met when a genetically modified
organism is considered. Also genetically engineered organisms are often
very fragile and unable to live and function in a natural community.
Bioremediation is a relatively new field, with the first patent issued
in the 1970s to stimulate subsurface microbial activity to cleanup gas
pollution. The field greatly expanded with the advancement of molecular
technologies during the 1980s and 1990s. Scientists were then better able
to study the kinds of microbes that existed in the environment.
Many microorganisms remain to be discovered. Field says, “Microorganisms
are like stars. ... Microbiologists know of the existence of many microorganisms
because of DNA sequences. ... There are probably millions more yet to
be discovered. There is a endless capacity of different microorganisms;
there is going to be new ones discovered all the time.”
For example, University of California, Davis, researchers have recently
discovered an organism that eats MTBE. Once added to gasoline to improve
air quality, MTBE has contaminated groundwater throughout the country,
with no way known to treat groundwater to remove the contaminant. Nicknamed
PM1, the newly discovered MTBE-eating organism is present in groundwater
but has to be pumped to the surface to multiply and eat MTBE.
Watwood says a great growth potential exists in the bioremediation field,
that there are many polluted sites in need of clean up. She also expects
bioremediation will be increasingly used for pollution prevention, with
waste streams treated before they cause environmental problems. The idea
is to eliminate environmental pollution, not just treat it once it occurs.
She says. “That is how I hope the field will evolve.”

|
|