ALN logo; link to Arid Lands Newsletter Home page No. 51, May/June 2002
Using geospatial technologies to understand dryland dynamics

Chavez et al. Table 1: Comparison of satellite imaging capabilities

Spatial, spectral and temporal resolutions for various imaging systems considered in this investigation, with a qualitative rating (poor, fair, good, excellent) of their applicability to detect and monitor active dust storms.

Satellite
Spatial resolution
Spectral resolution
Temporal resolution
GOES*
1 km / poor
1 visible band / poor
15 minutes / excellent
Landsat TM
30 m / excellent
6 bands / good
2 weeks / poor
WiFS
200 m / fair
2 bands / fair
5 days / poor
SeaWiFS
1 km / poor
8 bands / good
1 day / fair
AVHRR
1 km / poor
2 bands / fair
1 day / fair
MODIS
1 km/500 m/250 m / poor-fair
36 bands / excellent
1 day / fair

*Note, at this stage only the visible band of GOES has been used because of the size of most dust storms in the Mojave Desert makes them difficult to detect with the 1-km resolution of the visible band. Therefore, it is unlikely that they would be detected by the 4-km resolution of the thermal bands.

[Back to the article text]

Link to ALN home page Link to index page for back web issues Link to index page for pre-web issue archive Link to ALN #51 table of contents