Profile: Dr. Charles Sanchez
“Agriculture is being challenged to use resources more efficiently—to
reconcile economic realities with stewardship of the environment,” says
Dr. Charles Sanchez. He has been an associate research scientist at the
College’s Yuma Agricultural Center for five years. For the second time,
he currently is also the acting superintendent of the Center.
He describes his research program as largely developing water and nitrogen
management systems for vegetables and citrus crops, and reducing or eliminating
salinity in the soil. “Fertilizers may adversely affect the environment,”
he says. “We’re working to reduce their impact. “Our basic studies start
with careful monitoring of nitrogen transport in the soil’s vadose zone
to discover any problems. Then, we’re developing testing standards for
plant tissues and the soil. Another research facet is examining the placement
and timing of fertilizers to enhance their use by the crops. And we’re
trying to control the release of fertilizers with new technologies.” Irrigation
management is also paramount to conserve water, which is vitally important
in the desert, of course. Sanchez says many problems can be traced to less
than optimum water management, so he’s working to improve irrigation efficiency.
Sanchez is a native of New Mexico; in fact, his family has lived there
since Spanish Colonial days. His great-great-grandfather served in the
Territorial Legislature when Arizona and New Mexico were part of the same
Territory. His maternal grandfather was an Extension county agent; both
grandfathers were farmers. Sanchez earned his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees
at New Mexico State University, in Las Cruces, and his doctorate at Iowa
State University, in Ames. For four years, he was on the faculty at the
University of Florida before coming to Arizona.
Which Comes First?
Do improved living standards lead to greater empowerment of women—or
is it the other way around? The United Nation’s Development Programme’s
Report gives two indexes of societal development, ranking 174 countries.
The Human Development Index (HDI) considers overall quality of life, measured
by income, life expectancy, education, and literacy. The Gender Development
Index (GDI) adjusts these factors for sex. The study concluded, “No country
treats its women as well as its men.” Canada ranked the best in HDI, but
only ninth in GDI, where Sweden was ranked first. The United States ranked
second in HDI, but tied with Australia for fifth in gender equity.
Melissa Schorr, reporting in “Working Woman” magazine, Jan. 1996