Self Concept

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at the University of Arizona

Home

STAGES IN GROUP DEVELOPMENT

There are four stages in the development of the group.*

Self-Centered Stage

At first, members hesitate to share their feelings and beliefs. They ask questions rather than make statements thus showing their unwillingness "to stick their necks out." During this stage, each will be sizing up the situation and attempting to establish himself.

Frustration and Conflict Stage

Because authority has not yet been established, hostility will arise between the emerging leaders. These conflicts must be resolved before members can feel secure. Many groups collapse at this stage because they do not realize that stage three is coming.

Consolidation and Harmony Stage

Soon some persons find each other. This may split the group into cliques or consolidate it into a whole. Either the members develop skill in playing the different roles or the differences are glossed over and complacency follows. Permissiveness may develop and the group may move on to control its own behavior, or it may not develop and then the group will never pass the stage of verbalization but continue to fight out a sort of polite cold war.

Individual Self-Assessment

It may be quite a while before members become objective and self-critical. Then they emphasize problem solving and control of group processes. This does not mean compromise and submission, for the members may accept partial success, and move on to find improved ways. Because a group expects its members to change, it sets up training activities and undertakes frequent evaluations. It evaluates the program and behavior of the group, then it evaluates the behavior of individuals.

No group can grow through those four stages unless it can establish and conform to the expectations of the group. But only after members feel accepted and secure will they begin to explore their own feelings and desires and this leads to shifts in behavior toward the group’s standards. Most persons would rather be approved by their group than be right by the standards of the world at large. This shows how misleading a recommendation can be unless we know the standard of the group.

It is natural that group leaders hesitate to undertake discussions of group maturity and integration. There are some roles that neither officers nor members can easily perform. Thus it is important, even necessary that a place be reserved for a resource leader.

BACK

 

Home  Site Index   Search  Feedback  Guestbook

Syllabus  Written Assignments  Outside Lab Assignments  What is Leadership?  Self Concept   Parliamentary Procedure  Leadership Ideas  Win/Lose   Power  What is an Advisor?  What is a Program of Activities?  Effective Youth Organizations  Selecting/Electing Officers  Officer Guidelines

Send questions about this website to Denise Davies at ddavies@ag.arizona.edu.   For course information or questions not included in these pages contact Dr. James Knight. Copyright (c) 1998 Department of Agricultural Education, The University of Arizona.  Website version 1.2, last updated on Thursday, August 16, 2001.