• General information on Special Pesticide Registrations
• Table of Active Special Local Needs Pesticide (SLN,24c) Registrations for Arizona
• Table of 2007 SLN Renewals and Voluntary Cancellations
• Table of Historical Expired SLN (24c) Registrations for Arizona
• Table of Active Section 18 Exemptions for Arizona

Pink Bollworm Eradication Program

March 10, 2008. EPA is proposing revisions of 40 CFR 172.3(c)(1), Exemptions from the requirements from large-scale tests and federal experimental use permits (EUP).
Background: Section 5 of FIFRA provides that any person wishing to conduct large-scale experimental testing of new pesticides or new uses of existing pesticides must apply for a federal EUP. Obtaining a federal EUP (typically for less than 5,000 acres) can take up to 12 months, particularly if a temporary tolerance is involved, and can be cost prohibitive to researches. The purpose behind section 5 is to facilitate the generation of data necessary to support and application for registration under section 3 and yet provide sufficient regulatory control to prevent adverse environmental effects. The current definition of small-scale tests is unclear to state regulators, limits the proper evaluation of certain uses of new pesticides and does not adequately provide for allowance to conduct medium-scale tests involving registered pesticides without a federal EUP. Researchers have requested that EPA consider modifying the acreage exemptions on which experimental tests may be conducted without a federal EUP.
Issue: State Lead Agencies may not clearly know or agree upon what is exempted under small-scale tests.
Recommended Action: EPA should clarify part 172.3(c)(1) as follows: A small-scaled test involving use of a particular pesticide formulation that is conducted on a cumulative total of no more than 10 acres of land per pest per site per state per year.
Additional information:
Draft EUP Acreage Exemption Issue Paper (PDF, 93KB)
Public Comments from Kim Patten, Washington State University (PDF, 19KB)
For more information, or if you would like to provide comment on this issue, please contact Jack Peterson, Arizona Department of Agriculture at 602-542-0466, jpeterson@azda.gov.

December 19, 2007. EPA is extending the endosulfan comment period by 30 days. The new deadline will be Tuesday, Febuary 19. Notice of the extension will be published in the January 9 Federal Register. If you would like to provide comment to EPA on this issue, see the guidance document (PDF, 56KB) for a list of questions that EPA is seeking more information on as part of their assessment process.

August 28, 2007. "Pyrethroid re-evalution will reach far beyond California." The California Department of Pesticide Regulations placed 20 synthetic pyrethroids in 608 products from 123 registrants under review, after the active ingredient was discovered in sediments - not the water - of California urban and rural waterways. Read the article from Southeast Farm Press.

June 20, 2007. EPA issued five notices in the Federal Register of May 2, 2007, announcing the availability and seeking comments on EPA's revised human health risk assessments for the fumigants chloropicrin, dazomet, 1,3-dichloropropene, metam potassium, metam sodium, and methyl bromide. This notice announces EPA's decision to extend the comment period from July 2, 2007 to September 3, 2007, for the five actions. For more information view the Federal Register Notice.

March 21, 2007. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency have given the first joint approval of a North American Free Trade Agreement harmonized label for a pesticide product. The pesticide product is called Far-Go Granular Herbicide in the United States (EPA reg. 10163-287) and Avadex MicroActiv Herbicide in Canada and is registered for use on wheat, barley, beets, lentils and peas. See press release.

March 15, 2007. The California Department of Pesticide Regulations (CDPR) distributed a Notice of Proposed Regulatory Action that would revise the minimum qualifications for persons applying for a pest control adviser (PCA) license for the first time. Any interested person may present comments in writing about the proposed action to the agency contact person named below. Written comments must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 30, 2007. Comments regarding this proposed action may also be transmitted via e-mail at dpr07001@cdpr.ca.gov, or by facsimile (FAX) transmission at (916)324-1452.

Linda Irokawa-Otani, Regulations Coordinator
Department of Pesticide Regulations Coordinator
1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4015
Sacramento, California 95812-4015
(916)445-3991

Mac Takeda, Manager
Pest Management and Licensing Branch
Department of Pesticide Regulation
(916)445-3838

March 2, 2007. Pink Bollworm Eradication Program Information from the Arizona Cotton Research and Protection Council: On 28 Feb 2007, Western Farm Press erroneously reported, "Western Arizona Pink Bollworm Eradication Program on Hold." In fact, the PBW eradication as planned is a "Go" in LaPaz and Mohave counties of Arizona for 2007, with the decision by the federal government to fund the sterile moth program. This expansion will also include Southern California and Mexico. Yuma County will not enter the eradication program until 2008.

February 20, 2007. The label for Centric 40EG (EPA Reg. no. 100-1147, ai: thiamethoxam) has recently been amended. Label changes include revised total amount of Centric 40WG allowed per season on cotton and pecans. The revised specimen label can be viewed at http://www.syngentacropprotection.com/labels/ by selecting Centric 40WG from the drop-down Products menu.

November 21, 2006. EPA Issues Final Rule on Aquatic Pesticide Applications. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final rule clarifying two specific circumstances in which a Clean Water Act permit is not required before pesticides are applied. The two situations are when:

• pesticides are applied directly to water to control pests, including mosquito larvae, aquatic weeds and other pests in the water.
• pesticides are applied to control pests that are present over or near water where a portion of the pesticide will unavoidably be deposited to the water in order to target the pests effectively.

After considering two rounds of public comments, EPA concluded that the Clean Water Act does not require permits in these two situations. The final rule replaces EPA's Interpretive Statement on the Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United States in Compliance with FIFRA, published on Feb. 1, 2005. More information on EPA’s website.

November 15, 2006. EPA announces the availability of EPA's revised risk assessments for the N-methyl carbamate pesticide aldicarb. In addition, this notice solicits public comment on risk reduction options for aldicarb, as well as an initial impacts and/or preliminary benefits assessment for a number of aldicarb uses. The public is encouraged to suggest risk management ideas or proposals to address the risks identified. EPA is developing an Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED) for aldicarb through the full, 6-Phase public participation process that the Agency uses to involve the public in developing pesticide reregistration and tolerance reassessment decisions. Subsequently, EPA will complete the cumulative assessment for N-methyl carbamate pesticides, including aldicarb. Additional risk mitigation for dietary concerns may be necessary for aldicarb at that time. Comments must be received on or before January 16, 2007. Information on how to provide comments is available on EPA’s website.

October 6, 2006 EPA has published the Final Schedule for Registration Review of Conventional Pesticides (PDF file, 92 KB). For more information, please visit the EPA’s Registration Review Schedule web page.

February 26, 2003 The growing budget crisis may soon threaten the on-line availability of the pesticide use (1080) data currently being made possible through the Arizona agricultural statistics office. While there is funding to continue through the end of this June, that may well not be true beyond. This information has provided useful data to assist university researchers in identifying priority areas needing attention. It has also proved of great value in supporting Arizona's emergency exemption program to allow use of unregistered pesticides to deal with novel pest control problems. The system has made it unnecessary for growers to report separately their uses of soil applied pesticides that are on the groundwater protection list to the Department of Environmental Quality. All of these pluses would be lost if the system was shut down. We would go back to the days when anyone wishing to utilize this data would need to go to the Arizona Department of Agriculture and manually dig through the reports stored in boxes.

March 11, 2003 EPA Reopens Public Comment Period for Endangered Species and Pesticide Regulation Federal Register Notice

EPA's National Agriculture Compliance Assistance Center: This EPA site provides a succinct, general description of EPA's requirements for both regulatory and voluntary programs and links to major statutes.

Agricultural Chemical Use Database (National Agricultural Statistics Service)

• IR4 New Products/Transitional Solution List - August 2003 PDF file, 180 KB (The mission of Interregional Research Project #4 is to provide pest management solutions to growers of fruits, vegetables and other minor crops.)
• Review of New Insecticides Under Field Development For Desert Vegetable and Melon Production
• Table of currently in-use FQPA-targeted, registered insecticides for Southwestern crops and the pests they control
• Matrix of key crop/pest complexes in Southwestern cropping systems, their FQPA-threatened insecticides, their conventional and reduced risk alternatives
• Table of new, exempted or unregistered insecticides under development for Southwestern crops and the insect pests they target
• EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs web site covers many regulatory issues
• Arizona Department of Agriculture - Environmental Services Division
  
  

 

Arizona Pesticide Laws:

• Pesticide registration laws (3-341 through 3-356)
• Pesticide use laws (3-361 through 3-377)
• Pesticide/groundwater laws (49-301 through 49-310)

Arizona Rules:

• Pesticide (R3-3-101 through 506)
• State pesticide registration requirements (R3-3-701 through 704)
• Agricultural Safety (R3-3-1001 through 1011)
• Pesticides & groundwater (18-6-101 through 303)

Federal Law & Rules:

• Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
• Code of Federal Regulations: (Those relating to pesticides are in 40CFR parts 150 to 189)