Arizona Crop Information Site logo
University of Arizona
Desert Vegetable Advisory
 
Cooperative Extension
 
 

Yuma Agricultural Center, 6425 W. 8th St., Yuma, AZ 85364
Phone: 928-782-3836 FAX: 782-1940

 

November 27, 2002
Vol. 1; Issue 5

Production Update: Planting of lettuces, baby mixes, spinach and cole crops continues at a steady pace, and harvest is in full swing for most commodities in all growing areas. In general, yields and quality appear to be good and no major production problems have been reported. Temperatures in the three major growing areas have been around normal, but are cooling down considerably (Table 1). Melon harvest is almost complete and should be finished by Thanksgiving weekend.

Pest Update: Overall, insect flight activity appears to be declining, with the exception of aphid movement (Table 2) which is beginning to pick up in the Yuma and Gila valleys. As reported two weeks ago, foxglove aphid has been found colonizing head lettuce in the Yuma Valley and this aphid species has been positively identified in 2 more lettuce fields this week. In all cases where colonization has been reported, Admire was not applied at planting. All the foxglove aphid infestations have been found in the Yuma Valley from Co12th to Co15th and Ave D to the west main canal. In addition, foxglove aphids have been found in Algodones, Mexico.

Although thrips activity as measured by sticky traps has been relatively low (Table 2), thrips populations in head lettuce and romaine have been quite heavy this fall. Western flower thrips have become a major pest of head, leaf and romaine lettuce because of their ability to build up to large numbers, resulting in head contamination (Fig 1), and excessive scarring of leaf tissue from thrips feeding injury (Fig 2). The only viable means of controlling thrips is with insecticides. Lannate (methomyl; E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co.) combinations and Success (Dow AgroSciences LLC) are currently the industry standards for thrips control in lettuce. We have recently been asked by PCA's whether Proclaim (emamectin benzoate, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.) has thrips activity. Proclaim provides excellent control of worms. Because thrips are not listed on the Proclaim label, we decided to conduct a short efficacy trial to ascertain the activity of Proclaim on western flower thrips.

Figure 3 below provides data illustrating that Proclaim applied at a moderate rate (3.2 oz/ac) does not provide significant efficacy against thrips in head lettuce. The trial was conducted at the Yuma Ag Center in small, replicated plots (4 beds * 45 ft). The data represents the residual efficacy at 3, 7 and 14 days after treatment (DAT) for each compound following a broadcast spray application made on October 29 (post-thinning ;12 lf stage) and November 13 (pre-heading; 20 lf stage). In general, the number of thrips adults and larvae in Proclaim-treated plots did not differ significantly from the untreated check on any of the post-treatment sampling dates (Fig 3). Although the product may be efficacious at higher rates, we do not recommend that Proclaim be used for thrips suppression. Rather, the product provides good residual control of beet armyworm and cabbage looper at 3.2 oz and should be integrated into worm management programs at this rate. For more information on thrips management in lettuce visit the following ACIS sites:

Management of Aphids and Thrips on Leafy Vegetables

Impact and Management of Western Flower Thrips on Romaine Lettuce (2000), PDF file, 203KB (http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1177/az1177-1f.pdf)

Management of Western Flower Thrips in Head Lettuce with Conventional and Botanical Insecticides (2000), PDF file, 187KB (http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1177/az1177-1g.pdf)

Table 1. Temperature recorded from AZMET stations at three Yuma growing locations.

  Temperature (°F)
Yuma Valley   Gila Valley   Dome Valley/Welton
Date Max Min Avg   Max Min Avg   Max Min Avg
Sep 2-6 108 78 93    108 76 92    110 75 92
Sep 6-10 - - -    96 75 86   95 73 84
Sep 10-13 100 69 84    104 68 86   101 70 86
Sep 13-18 104 70 87    106 69 88   106 70 88
Sep 18-23 103 67 85   105 65 85   103 64 84
Sep 23-27 107 69 88    109 67 88   108 64 86
Sep 27-30 95 69 82    95 64 80   96 63 80
Sep 30-Oct 4 83 57 70    85 54 70   85 51 68
Oct 4-Oct 8 93 55 74   95 54 75    94 51 73
Oct 8-Oct 11 97 60 78    99 58 79   99 56 77
Oct 11- Oct 15 94 62 78   95 60 78   97 59 78
Oct 15-Oct 18 87 61 74   87 58 72   89 57 73
Oct 18-Oct 21 87 58 73   86 56 71   88 54 71
Oct 21- Oct 25 85 58 72   84 58 71   86 55 71
Oct 25 - Oct 30 80 56 68   81 54 68    81 52 67
Oct 30- Nov 5 80 51 66    81 50 66   82 47 65
Nov 5- Nov 13 81 50 66    83 49 66   82 46 64
Nov 13-Nov 22 80 48 64   82 46 64    82 41 62



Table 2. Insect activity measured from yellow sticky traps at at three Yuma growing locations.

  Mean Adults / Sticky Trap / Day
Yuma Valley Gila Valley Dome Valley/Welton
Date WF LM THP APH WF LM THP APH WF LM THP APH
Sep 2-6 2.4 0.1 0.1 - 14.1 0.1 0.1 - 34.3 0.1 0.1 -
Sep 6-10 1.9 0.9 0.5 - 8.5 0.2 0.1 - 16 1.8 0.4 -
Sep 10-13 17.1 3.3 0.3 - 20.1 0.9 0.1 - 24.8 2.4 0.4 -
Sep 13-18 14.5 5.7 0.5 - 6 0.2 0 - 53.3 0.7 0.2 -
Sep 18-23 10.3 2.6 0.4 - 6 0.8 0.1 - 19.5 2 0.4 -
Sep 23-27 4.3 1.6 0.3 - 5 1.2 0.3 - 17.8 0.8 0 -
Sep 27-30 5.6 0.4 0.2 - 1.7 0.1 0.2 - 2.7 1.6 0.4 -
Sep 30-Oct 4 6.3 0.3 0.1 - 0.9 0 0.3 - 1.3 1.1 0.2 -
Oct 4-Oct 8 4.4 3.2 0.3 0.1 13.4 0.6 1 - 2.8 3.1 0.5 0
Oct 8-Oct 11 1.1 4.8 0.4 0.1 20.7 1.1 0.8   1.6 3 0.1 0
Oct 11- Oct 15 2 3 0.3 0.7 8.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 10.8 2 2 0.1
Oct 15-Oct 18 2.3 2.1 0.3 0.3 5.2 1.2 0.4 1 16.4 1.5 3 0
Oct 18-Oct 21 2.8 3.0 1 0.9 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.5 6.2 2 2.2 0.1
Oct 21- Oct 25 2.0 1.3 0.3 0 0.7 0 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.1 0.3 0.3
Oct 25 - Oct 30 2.7 1.8 0.9 0.4 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.4 1 1 0.4 0.2
Oct 30- Nov 5 1.8 3.5 0.3 0.5 1.7 0.9 0.3 1.2 0.7 1.6 0.4 0.1
Nov 5- Nov 13 1.3 2.1 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.3 1.5 1.9 1.3 0.6 0.1
Nov 13-Nov 22 0.5 1.4 0.2 1.3 1.0 0.1 0.2 3.6 3.9 1.5 1.1 0.3

 

WF=Silverleaf whitefly; LM= Leafminers; THP=Thrips; APH=Aphids 

Photo of western flower thrips (very tiny insects) infesting the inner surface of a cap (outside) leaf in head lettuce.

Figure 1. Western flower thrips infesting the inner surface of a cap leaf in head lettuce, Yuma, Arizona, spring 1998


Photos of thrips scarring on a young head lettuce leaf and a photo of thrips damage to the leaf tissue and midrib of a romaine leaf.

Figure 2. Western flower thrips feeding damage (scarring) to young head lettuce leaves (A), and to leaf tissue and midribs of romaine (B), Yuma, Arizona, spring 2001.

Graph of the number of adult thrips found in head lettuce after applications of various insecticides ( Proclaim 3.2 oz.; Success 5 oz.; Lannate 0.7 lb. + Mustang 4 oz.; and untreated check).

Graph of the number of thrips larvae found in head lettuce after applications of various insecticides ( Proclaim 3.2 oz.; Success 5 oz.; Lannate 0.7 lb. + Mustang 4 oz.; and untreated check).

Figure 3. Abundance of western flower thrips adults and larvae in head lettuce plants following spray applications of Proclaim, Success and Lannate/Mustang, Yuma Agric. Center, fall 2002.

Detour sign = use your "Back" button to return to ACIS
PDF documents require Adobe Acrobat Reader

AZMETDetour sign Weather Data

Disclaimers--


For more information contact:
John C. Palumbo, jpalumbo@ag.arizona.edu Research Scientist (Entomology)
College of Agriculture, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Home | Cotton | Veggies | Forages | Grains | Citrus | Crop x Crop
Insects | Diseases| Weeds | Pesticides | Economics | News | Weather | Research | Photos | Contacts | General Info.





document located at: http://cals.arizona.edu/crops/vegetables/insects/advisories/2002/vegadv112702.html
Copyright © 2001 University of Arizona,
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
webmaster: jsjones@ag.arizona.edu