- Other Resources
- Biodiversity Informatics
- Convolvulaceae Pollen Atlas
- Convolvulaceae of Sonora
- Legumes of Arizona
- Pringle’s Arizona Catalog
- Nichol's Turk's Head Cactus Working Group
- Section 6 Grants
- About ARIZ
Section 6 Funding for Research on Threatened and Endangered Arizona Plants
2014 DEADLINE: MAY 16, 2014
Award year 2013
- Continued implementation of Grand Canyon National Park Recovery Plan actions for sentry milk-vetch (Astragalus cremnophylax var. cremnophylax). Janice Busco, Lori Makarick, and Gregory Holm; Grand Canyon National Park.
- Effect of fire on a population of the endangered cactus, Coryphantha robustispina, on three pastures of the King’s Anvil Ranch, State Trust Land, Altar Valley, Pima Co., AZ. Pat King, Robert Schmalzel, Kristen Egan, Katie Cline, and Tom Sheridan; Altar Valley Conservation Alliance.
- A workshop to develop survey and monitoring protocols for Fickeisen’s plains cactus. Dr. Steven W. Carothers and William Cardasco; SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) and Babbitt’s Landsward Foundation.
- Peebles Navajo cactus: Characterization and assessment of phenotypic attributes between two populations near Joseph City, Arizona. Jony Cockman; BLM.
- Improved genetic resources for the study of Huachuca water umbel. Shannon Fehlberg; Desert Botanical Garden.
- Monitoring of Cimicifuga arizonica (Arizona bugbane, Ranunculaceae) populations on Bill Williams Mountain related to Forest Service plans to burn the mountain. Glenn Rink; Far Out Botany.
- Demography Studies for Carex specuicola (Navajo sedge, Cyperaceae). Glenn Rink; Far Out Botany.
- Distribution and morphological studies of Pediocactus peeblesianus (Cactaceae). Marc Baker; Southwest Botanical Research.
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS
2014 deadline: MAY 16 2014
The Herbarium at the University of Arizona is collaborating with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Arizona Department of Agriculture to manage and allocate the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 6 funding for plants in Arizona. Proposals for studies on threats, demography, monitoring, systematics, status reviews, etc. of threatened and endangered plant species, or plant species of other special concern, are solicited. Plants that are listed as threatened, endangered, or have candidate status (see list here) will rank higher than sensitive or rare plants. Researchers are encouraged to contact Julie Crawford, FWS (phone: 520-670-6150; email: Julie_Crawford@fws.gov), to discuss potential submissions. She can also answer questions regarding the applicability of the submission.
We anticipate supporting three to eight projects per year at levels of approximately $5000 to $20000 per project.
CHANGE: As of 2014, we are now accepting proposals for two-year projects. Projects that require less time are encouraged to be completed early.
Proposals are reviewed by a committee for the importance of the species, intellectual merit and feasibility of the proposed research, appropriateness of the budget, and clarity of the proposal. Projects that are recommended for funding are ranked and funded as funds allow. Researchers are notified in mid- to late-summer.
Contracts are sent to the selected researchers by the Arizona Department of Agriculture within four months of the award notification (usually early fall) and will indicate actual start and end dates. Contracts must be signed and returned within 30 days of receipt. Funds are generally distributed on a reimbursable basis. Researchers are welcome to submit expense reports and invoices up to once quarterly. A brief interim report will be due at the end of year one, and the final project report will be due at the end of year two.
The final report is an expected deliverable of this research and should include introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, and literature cited sections. Prior to approval and release of funding, reports will be reviewed by the section 6 grant committee and FWS species leads for completeness, clarity, and usefulness to the FWS for species management and recovery. Insufficient final reports will be returned with comments, and researchers will be expected to remedy the report prior to final approval. Draft final reports are welcome at any time.
Proposals should be prepared according to the following outline. If an item is not applicable to this project, write "NA" for that item. Projects should be designed to be complete within two years. Funding beyond two years will require submission of additional competitive proposals. Proposals can be single-spaced but should be prepared with a font no smaller than 11 point. Questions on grant preparation should be directed to Shelley McMahon (phone: 520-621-7243; email: firstname.lastname@example.org).
1. Project Title:
2. Species: List all species that will be investigated as part of this project; for each give:
2a. Federal Rank:
2b. State Heritage Rank:
3. Name of Investigator(s): Please specify a Prinicipal Investigator and any additional investigators.
4. Mailing Address of Principal Investigator: For investigators associated with more than one institution, this must be the address of the institution that would be receiving the contract. Also provide:
4a. Phone number for PI:.
4b. Email address for PI:.
4c. Institutional affiliation for PI. If submitting as an individual, please indicate.
4d. Institutional contact information. Name and address of official who is authorized to sign the contract and process reimburesments.
5. Proposed Start Date: Give month, day, and year.
6. Proposed End Date: Give month, day, and year.
7. Funding History and Needs: Is this a request for continued funding for work already started under a previous Section 6 request?
8. Joint Project with Another State: Provide details, if applicable.
9. Recovery Plan Task Numbers:
10. Recovery Plan Task Priorities:
11. Threatened or Endangered Species Permit Required: A Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit from FWS may be required if listed plants, parts of plants, and/or seeds will be collected.
12. Other Threatened or Endangered Species in Project Area:
13. Projected Conducted within Designated Critical Habitat:
15. Expected Results or Benefits: One half page maximum.
16. Approach: Describe the general approach; e.g., herbarium study, plot monitoring, etc. One paragraph maximum.
17. Current Year Procedures: Describe in detail the methodology of the proposed study. Two pages maximum.
18. Divergence from Original Approach:
20. Present Year Funding Request:
21. Budget: Budget should be broken down into anticipated costs for personnel, travel, and supplies. Matching costs should be identified, and should constitute 40% to 50% of the total costs. Matching costs can be in any category of expenditures-personnel, travel, supplies, or equipment.
22. Previous funding performance: If you have received Federal or other grants, please list references to contact. Have you ever defaulted on a previous grant?
WHAT AND WHERE TO SUBMIT
Proposals should be sent electronically to Shelley McMahon (mcmahonm at email.arizona.edu). Include a 2-page Curriculum Vitae for the Principal Investigator. If electronic submission is not possible, send three hard copies to Herbarium, Herring Hall, School of Plant Sciences, PO Box 210036, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721.