|
Determining the Amount of Irrigation Water Applied to a Field Written by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1. Conversion from cubic feet per second
(cfs) to gallons per minute (gpm) to Miners inches.
Flow Rate Conversion Table |
||
| Cubic Feet per Second (cfs) | Gallons per Minute (gpm) | Miner's Inches |
|
1
|
454
|
40
|
|
2
|
908
|
80
|
|
4
|
1816
|
160
|
|
6
|
2724
|
240
|
|
8
|
3632
|
320
|
|
10
|
4540
|
400
|
Dont Forget the Efficiency
The one factor in irrigation that is most often overlooked is the efficiency
of the irrigation system itself. There are many different types of efficiency
and many different ways to define it. Efficiency here refers to the overall
systems ability to apply an equal amount of water to all parts of
the field. A system with 100% efficiency would be able to apply the same
amount of water to every inch of the field, head end, tail end, center,
side, etc. No system is 100% efficient. Drip systems are the most efficient
and they are usually near 95% efficient. Surface systems are notorious
for inefficiency, but properly maintained fields can achieve efficiencies
as high as some sprinkler systems.
Table 2 gives the range of efficiencies normally associated with different types of irrigation systems. In order to apply the proper amount of water to a field, first you must decide what efficiency to use in your calculations. The table gives a range of values for seasonal and peak use periods. These are provided because some systems are better equipped to handle large applications and during times of peak water use, when water demand is high, the systems efficiency is increased.
For example, all of the surface systems have an increase in their efficiency
from seasonal to peak use periods because surface systems can apply large
amounts of water more efficiently than smaller amounts. During the early
part of the season, these systems are inefficient because they over-water.
Overall, seasonal efficiency is relatively low compared to the efficiency
during peak use. Sprinkler and drip systems (with the exception of the
traveler sprinkler system), on the other hand, maintain their efficiencies
regardless of seasonal or peak use periods. This is because these systems
apply large and small quantities of water at about the same efficiency.
Taking the average of the ranges in Table 2 is probably a good start,
although many surface systems operate at the very low end of the ranges
given. Also, many sprinkler systems with LEPA (Low Energy Precision Application)
systems and drop nozzles achieve even higher efficiencies than those given.
You can contact your local Natural Resources Conservation Service office
or local consultant who may be able to perform an analysis on your system
to determine the irrigation efficiency. Once the efficiency has been determined,
use that to adjust your irrigation amounts.
Lets take the second example where the grower was determining how long the set time should be to irrigate 4.0 inches. If he has a system that is 75% efficient, then the target amount would be increased from 4.0 inches to 5.3 inches. In order to account for the systems inefficiency, the efficiency must be divided into the targeted amount. In the example above, the efficiency of 75% (or 0.75) is divided into the target amount of 4 inches:
4.0/0.75 = 5.3
This gives the actual amount of water that needs to be applied to assure
that the entire field receives at least 4 inches of water. Of course,
some of the field will receive more water, but that is the cost of the
systems inefficiency.
To determine the set time for the example above, we use the Irrigators Equation and calculate for 5.3 inches instead of 4.0 inches:
5 × t = 5.3 × 3.8
Q × t = d × A
Solving for t we get:
t = (5.3 × 3.8) / 5 = 4 hours
The set time should be four hours to assure that all parts of the field receive at least 4.0 inches of water Proper calculation and keeping records of irrigation amounts and set times, as well as a realistic estimate of system efficiency, will help to assure that your crop receives all the water it needs.
The information provided in this bulletin is also available in an Irrigation Slide Chart (1999), which helps to determine set times and flow rates. The slide chart is written in both English and Spanish and is easy to use. The slide chart is available through your local Cooperative Extension office.
|
Table 2. Estimated seasonal average and peak
water-use period irrigation efficiencies.*
|
|||
|
Type of Irrigation System
|
Efficiency Range (%)
|
||
|
Seasonal Average
|
Peak Use Period
|
||
|
Surface
|
Furrow (without reuse)
|
55-77
|
77-80
|
|
Border (without reuse)
|
63-84
|
77-87
|
|
|
Basin
|
70-80
|
70-87
|
|
|
Precision-leveled basin
|
77-84
|
80-87
|
|
|
Sprikler
|
Moved lateral
|
70-80
|
70-80
|
|
Traveler or boom
|
67-85
|
55-70
|
|
|
Solid set
|
70-87
|
70-87
|
|
|
Center pivot
|
80-87
|
80-87
|
|
|
Lateral move
|
84-90
|
84-90
|
|
|
Drip
|
Point Source
|
74-93
|
74-93
|
|
Drip Tape
|
85-95
|
85-95
|
|
|
* Modified from Hoffman et al. (1990)
|
|||
References
Hoffman, G.J., T.A. Howell and K.H. Solomon, eds. 1990.
Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engr. ASAE Monograph
No. 9. St. Joseph, MI 1040 pp.
Irrigation Slide Chart. 1999. The University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension, Pub. az1135, Arizona Water Series: Number 21. (English/Spanish)
For further information contact your local Cooperative Extension office.
The University of Arizona is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative
Action Employer. Any products, services, or organizations that are mentioned,
shown, or indirectly implied in this publication do not imply endorsement
by the University of Arizona.
Document located http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/water/az1157.html
Published February 2000
Return to College publication list